Who was Andrew Latta McNaughton and what did he do?

Who was Andrew Latta McNaughton and what did he do?

Andrew George Latta McNaughton, army officer, scientist, diplomat (b at Moosomin, NWT [Sask] 25 Feb 1887; d at Montebello, Qué 11 July 1966). He was trained as an engineer at McGill, enlisted in the nonpermanent militia in 1909 and took the 4th Battery of the Canadian Expeditionary Force overseas in 1914.

When did Andrew McNaughton join the Canadian Army?

McNaughton joined the Canadian militia in 1909. He took the 4th Battery of the Canadian Expeditionary Force overseas with the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 and arrived in France in February 1915.

What did Andrew McNaughton believe about the militia?

In 1931, McNaughton forcefully stated his belief that “a Citizen Militia…is the proper type of Land Defence Force for Canada” with the “permanent force militia” as the professional army was euphemistically described was to serve as the “instructional corps” for the militia.

Where did Andrew McNaughton go to high school?

Born in Moosomin, District of Assiniboia, North-West Territories (now part of Saskatchewan ), on 25 February 1887, McNaughton was a student at Bishop’s College School in Lennoxville, Quebec.

What did General Andrew McNaughton do for a living?

General Andrew George Latta McNaughton CH CB CMG DSO CD PC (25 February 1887 – 11 July 1966) was a Canadian electrical engineer, scientist, army officer, cabinet minister, and diplomat.

Born in Moosomin, District of Assiniboia, North-West Territories (now part of Saskatchewan ), on 25 February 1887, McNaughton was a student at Bishop’s College School in Lennoxville, Quebec.

When did Andrew McNaughton get his most serious wound?

His most serious wound occurred on 5 February 1918 when he was hit by the fragments of a German shell, requiring a stay in a hospital. By war’s end, McNaughton was widely considered the most talented and capable artilleryman in any army.

What kind of Intellect did Andrew McNaughton have?

McNaughton was described as “a forceful dynamic thruster with a tornado-like intellect”, whom the historian James Eayers wrote “dominated his colleagues in the military establishment as a great oak dominates a scrub forest”.